• Português (Brasil)
  • English (United Kingdom)
Login de Cliente
  • SOBRE NÓS
    • Nosso Negócio
    • Empresa
    • Oportunidades de Trabalho
    • Notícias
    • Contato
  • Nosso Produto
    • Social-IDNOW™
    • SocialSalesNOW
BLOGS Social Business

Social Business

My Private Parts

 E-mail

Parallels between Individual Privacy and Company Transparency

Until a few years ago I kept my life relatively private. Not only in the sense of keeping personal information from the public, but also by segmenting my social circles. I had multiple personas, with clear boundaries between information I would share among “family”, “friends”,  “co-workers”, or “acquaintances.”

When I started using social networking sites a couple of years ago, I initially transposed my segmentation to the virtual life (I communicated with family by phone and e-mail, Facebook is for friends, LinkedIn is for professional connections, etc). But it became increasingly difficult to manage all those groups and the leaking of context between them (despite the efforts of social network websites to help you manage "circles" or "groups").

There was a point where I gave up maintaining those personal circles. It is just too difficult to keep track of who is in which group and what are the overlaps. I still try to route content that is relevant to each group, but I assume that what I say online can and will be seen by everyone. To a large degree, I gave up my privacy as most people understand it.

While it was initially difficult to make that leap, I eventually found the experience to be liberating. Once I internalized my newly found transparency, I did not need to think twice about who was the audience before writing or saying something. I can say what I think, long as that was something I am willing to share with the world.

Of course, I do not advocate the end of the rights to segmentation, privacy or secrecy. On the contrary, I think those rights become even more important to freedom in a more social world. What I am saying is that, from a personal perspective, refraining from exercising those rights in excess for the illusion of privacy can be a very liberating experience.

I think the same applies to companies and social organizations. Advocating organizational transparency might trigger skepticism among people used to functional segmentation, but we are going from communicating only in a “need to know basis”, to the “public by default” era. With more organizational transparency, perhaps we sacrifice some focus and accountability, but if vision and strategy is shared effectively, we gain in execution and don't need to spend as much time in management and alignment.

If companies are to engage with customers using social media, they must be more transparent and less controlling in that interaction. They also need to transform themselves from the inside-out. Employees must be trusted and empowered to help the organization engage satisfactorily with customers.

When companies go through that transformation, I suspect their experience will be similar to my personal evolution from a “private” to a “social” person and they will find that it is easier, not harder, to conduct business that way.

And you, what is your secret?

Tweet
Share

Symbols, Storytelling and Corporate Culture

 E-mail

Caesar's wife must not only be honest, she must look honest.

I was participating in the last #custserv Twitter Chat (Tuesdays, 9PM ET) and @richardnatoli posed the question (paraphrased):

How to manage the culture of the organization as new employees join and mesh with existing employees? We are trying to cultivate a culture that embraces the value of being proactive.

The group offered several answers, ranging from managing culture during the hiring process, to establishing best practices and policies, mentorship and training programs, etc.

I offered that is also important to use unstructured approaches to cultivate and manage company culture, mentioned Storytelling and Symbols as tools, and promised to post this article.

Wikipedia can tell what Storytelling is and a quick search will find many books on how it can be applied in business. But I wanted to share an experience as an example.

The Frugal Company

A few years ago, I was working for a small company. We had started it from scratch and bootstrapped it without any external capital. Because of that, frugality was embedded in our organizational DNA, it was an important company value. There were no written rules, but we booked the cheapest coach tickets available, our expense reports did not include expensive bottles of wine, we had spartan furniture in the office.

As we became successful, for the first time around 2002, we started hiring several outside directors and VPs, many coming from larger tech companies in Silicon Valley.

It did not take long for the problem to emerge. New people were used to nice hotels and business class flights, and that created management problems and conflict with old employees as you can imagine.

The corporate reaction was to set new "travel and expense policies" to standardize the behavior of older and new employees. The hotel rate limit was $100/night, which allowed for a reasonable business hotel in most cities, but was certainly not enough for the Marriott or the Embassy Suites.

Of course, that generated a lot of talk and rebellion. Old employees were bothered by the attitude of newcomers when it came to using company money. New employees thought the company was unreasonably stingy.

What happened over the next couple of months was truly enlightening to me.

Telling Stories

I had a collection of frugality stories from the very early startup times that I used to tell and retell at corporate functions.

There was  the time when we attended Comdex in Las Vegas and had to share rooms at the Motel 6 on Tropicana Blvd. Or when I had to carry and smuggle an IBM 3270 terminal from the parking lot three blocks from the Moscone Center in San Francisco to our trade show booth so that we avoid paying absurd trade show equipment fees. I was almost run over by a bus on Mission St.

During those times of growth turbulence, we had a happy hour and I told those stories over the bar table to a group of the newcomers. This was not new to me, but it was new to them. The stories spread like wildfire. Next day, there were people around the water coolers retelling Marcio's stories.

Motel with Rodents

At about the same time the CEO and I (CTO at the time) were planning our annual media tour, going to New York City and Boston for briefings with media and market analysts. If you have been to those cities, you know you cannot stay anywhere for $100/night, even in 2003. It just made business sense to make an exception to the rule and pay more to stay closer to where our meetings were going to be.

When the person making the reservations for us came to ask, we decided to stick to the policy. We stayed in Queens for our meetings in NYC and at a really bad motel outside Boston.

When we came back, our PR person told a couple of the sales people what we went through. I observed the same story spreading phenomena: next day everyone was asking me about the rodent encounter at the motel in Boston.

Organizational Mythology

We never had any other problem or complaints with travel expenses. Everyone, old and new, had internalized careful use of company money as a cultural value. If we removed the policies restricting expenses, nothing would change.

In retrospect, this is what had happened:

  • The old stories, which all old employees had either lived or heard many times before formed the "company mythology" that works through people's right-side of the brain to support the company culture.
  • The decision to go against common sense served as a symbol and validation of that culture. If the CEO would spend the night in Queens to attend meetings in NYC, why should a sales person complain about not been able to stay at the Marriott in every city?

So, answering to Richard's question, I would say that to manage company culture, to keep it from diluting as you bring new people, or developing new desirable values, you need to do all things you know you need to do: hire with the culture in mind, implementing training and mentoring programs, explicitly articulate your values and implementing policies and practices aligned with them.

But as or perhaps more important, you need to collect stories every organization has (embellish them to make them interesting and memorable if you have too) and cultivate a mythology by repeated storytelling. That process has to be authentic, but sometimes can benefit from a bit of deliberation.

Richard, in your case, think of the real stories that highlight pro-activeness and make it a habit to tell that story at every opportunity.

Apple and Steve Jobs do it too

As it is the case with Caesar's wife, being true to your values is not enough. The leadership must provide the symbols, the validation points for that culture. Occasionally, the leaders need to go against common sense (those are the stronger memorable symbols) to make a point that lets people know how important that is.

Every strong culture does that. Even if you never worked at Apple, you heard the stories about Steve Jobs firing people on the spot if he did not like a design. People at Apple must pay attention to detail. They know the user experience is important. And they understand that if you don't internalize those values, you will be fired by Jobs himself.

Do you think Jobs walked around firing people? No, he probably did it once or twice (and probably did it against business common sense). But those stories and symbols are memorable and get passed from employee to employee (in the case of Apple, even outside the company).

That is Apple's culture. Those are the stories that support that culture.

The summary firings by Jobs or my stay at the Boston motel with rodents are strong symbols that validate to people how important those values are.

Hope this is useful.

Tweet
Share

8 Pontos de Verificação para o Envolvimento com o Cliente

 E-mail

iStock_000004475433XSmall

Social Media é fundamentalmente diferente da mídia tradicional no fato de que ele é aberto e permite a comunicação bi-direcional e peer-to-peer fora do controle do marketer. A mudança para a nova mídia nos obriga a rever alguns dos processos que usamos em marketing.

Serviço ao cliente é o novo Marketing

Temos empresas segmentadas em departamentos dedicados à "influência" com os clientes na pre-venda, e outros para ouvir ou "guiar" os problemas do cliente após a venda. Essa segmentação otimiza as organizações para a eficiência, mas oferece uma experiência muitas vezes inconsistente para o cliente à medida que evoluem através do ciclo de vida de leads a comprador, e de cliente satisfeito a leal defensor da marca.

Na era Social Business, os clientes exigem uma experiência melhor. A pessoa que representa a empresa em qualquer interação com o cliente deve ter poderes para responder a uma pergunta, resolver um problema, coletar feedback e satisfazer uma necessidade no momento.

Ser capaz de comunicar-se através de múltiplos canais já não é suficiente, você deve ser capaz de alternar entre os canais, sem perder o contexto ou deixar cair a bola.

Esta mudança irá estressar modelos de negócios atuais e requer mudanças na forma como nos envolvemos com leads e clientes.

8 Pontos de Verificação para o envolvimento do cliente

Só você sabe o que se aplica para o seu negócio, mas aqui estão alguns pontos a considerar quando se re-avalia a forma como sua empresa interage com clientes.

  • Fale como uma pessoa! Os clientes podem ver através das mensagens de marketing e detectar as intenções por trás deles. Comunique-se tão transparente quanto possível e utilize uma linguagem direta. Evite falar como marketer.
  • Reconhecer o valor da participação. Não é apenas a soma das transações. Precisamos adicionar a esse valor a co-criação (produto e conhecimento de marketing) e todas as outras transações influenciada pela pessoa durante processo de participação. Não pense sobre o tamanho do negócio, mas quanto é o valor que o cliente traz para a empresa ao longo do tempo.
  • Vá onde os clientes estão. Pode ser fóruns on-line ou sites de mídia social. Empregue ferramentas sociais embutidas em seu sistema de Vendas / Marketing para escalar as interações das pessoas. Automação é bom para os processos de back-end, não para relacionamento com o cliente.
  • Comprometa-se com o cliente. Você pode terceirizar o Atendimento ao Cliente ou vender por meio de canais indiretos. Tendo outras entidades que envolva seus clientes é bom, mas você precisa possuir o relacionamento/participação com os clientes, ou com seu concorrente.
  • Abra sua Base de Dados de Conhecimento. Seu BD deve estar aberto a contribuições externas e acessível para que os clientes possam se auto-ajudar e ajudar aos outros, poupando seus recursos para lidar com os casos em que a ação específica é necessária. O cliente social muitas vezes sabe mais sobre o produto que o propio vendedor.
  • Abra o seu processo de design de produtos para incluir clientes. Eu não quero dizer apenas ter um gerente de produto coletando casos de uso de interações anedótica com o cliente. Estou me referindo verdadeiramente a um processo aberto usando a tecnologia de computação social, se necessário, para que o cliente possa ajudar a co-criar a solução, ofereça sugestões, priorize recursos em uma participação contínua e iterativa.
  • Opere em tempo real. Se um cliente não está contente, você quer saber imediatamente, antes que ele influencie 10 outras futuros leads. Um cliente satisfeito torna-se um defensor da marca.
  • Torne Marketing em uma câmara de ressonância. Nós já sabemos que a melhor maneira de convencer um lead é ter o aval de clientes existentes. Conecte seus clientes satisfeitos com seus leads, esteja na conversa e ressoe/amplifique. Esse é o novo papel do marketing.
Tweet
Share

Business Decisions, Analysis and Social Media

 E-mail

istock_000012210065xsmall

Is Social Media making us less objective?

When we collect data for analysis, we use methods that are not completely open; our questions in surveys and interviews assume a certain business model behind them. We can attempt to collect data that is representative, balanced and complete.

When we switch from asking to listening (in Social Media channels), we lose some of control over the data gathering process and the risk is that the data we collect is less objective.

Are business decisions made on anecdotal evidence or objective analysis?

Most people in business were trained as analysts and strive to make decisions based on objective information. We understand the limitations of business modeling, but diligently attempt to apply it to every aspect of what we do.

But most people don't make strategic decisions every day and the truth is that the leaders doing it work mostly off anecdotal information. The CEO visits two customers (out of thousands) and they both say the same thing, creating an insight. The VP meets someone at a party, just a day before that important meeting. Executives don't get all data and receive influence from internal and external analysts.

Serendipity, coincidence, social factors are really what trigger the insight behind new ideas and decisions in business.

Analysis is the filter, not the source of business decisions

That doesn't mean analysis is less important. Once an idea emerges from insight, analysis must be used to validate or to kill them. This is what happens in most companies, even when we play the theater where ideas are presented as if it came from an analytical process.

It should not be surprising. The scientific method is also about using insight to propose a theory and then use analytical experiments to collect supporting data to validate or invalidate it.

What is the role of Social Media in data gathering?

So, our ideation and decision-making process has those two sides (synthesis/insights, analysis/validation).

If we understand the nature of Social Media, we don't need to be afraid that the shift towards it as a communication channel will make our analysis less objective.

Social Media, besides being the main channel for customer engagement in the future, like meeting face-to-face, is naturally a good place to collect anecdotal evidence, customer stories, outside perspective.

Can it also be source of objective data? Not today. Population coverage (Social Media is still fully adopted by a small portion of the customer base in most businesses), data structure are open issues that need to be addressed in the future.

Tweet
Share

Customer Service: Not Saving Transaction, but Keeping Company Promise

 E-mail

In a discussion that (as far as I know) started during the #custserv chat (every Tuesday, 9PM ET) and then moved to Google+, my friend Alan Berkson (@berkson0) posed the following (paraphrased) question:

Should Customer Service spend the same energy with every customer, or should it spend more time with customers who made larger purchases?

I adapted my answer to that question into this post.

As with any good question, the answer is "it depends". There are at least two different angles to answer.

Rational 1: Spend as much time as necessary to solve the problem

 The mission of Customer Service is to complete/ensure the delivery of value to customers. It can only be successful if it is fully committed to that goal.

If solving post-transaction problems is routinely taking time that makes the business non-viable, the root of the problem is elsewhere (badly designed product/service, unrealistic expectations).

Of course, everything has a limit. There are situations where Customer Service better "fire the customer" (as discussed in a recent #custserv chat).

Rational 2: Optimize resources to maximize returns

 Generally, businesses try to allocate resources so that it maximizes return. So it is natural that a company will spend more resources to address issues affecting a large portion of the business.

Spend more resources on bigger deals.

A new variable is that it is becoming difficult to measure the "lifetime value" of a customer relationship. As Social Media enables more peer-influence,  that "small" customer might be the person who brings you or kill the deal of your life in the future.

My Point-of-View

In the most common scenario where Customer Service interventions are exceptions and not the rule (i.e. post-sale issues are relatively rare), I would advocate rationale 1: Focus on making the customer happy without looking at the meter.

Looking at customer service time based on size of the deal makes more sense in cases where post-transaction interventions are common, part of the usual transaction workflow in the business model.

Customer Service: You are not trying to save a transaction, you are keeping the company promise to its customers.

Tweet
Share

Mais Artigos...

  • Sales Presentations: Are You Hot or What?
  • The Boundaryless Corporation
  • Was it as good for you as it was for me?
  • Negócios e Relacionamentos

Página 1 de 11

Início
Anterior
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Próximo
Fim
feed-image Feed Entries

Social Business Blog




This Blog is dedicated to discussion of the effects of Social Media in Business.

The Badge above has links to my social profile (Social-ID). To create your Social-ID and get a badge for your blog or website, check Social-ID NOW.

Social Sales Now

Learn More

Arquivo de Blogs

  • My Private Parts
  • Symbols, Storytelling and Corporate Culture
  • 8 Pontos de Verificação para o Envolvimento com o Cliente
  • Business Decisions, Analysis and Social Media
  • Customer Service: Not Saving Transaction, but Keeping Company Promise
  • Sales Presentations: Are You Hot or What?
  • The Boundaryless Corporation
  • Was it as good for you as it was for me?
  • Negócios e Relacionamentos
  • Klout: Like.
  • Social Media e Vendas B2B - Tempo de Mudanças
  • Customer Service through Twitter - Sustainable?
  • The Social Media Protocol
  • Social Marketing Funnel [graphic]
  • Customer Service and Free Lunches
  • The latest E20 wonder: Inter-Dimensional Gate
  • How does Social Media Scale Personal Engagement?
  • Social Media Campaigns - Market Segmentation
  • "Consumerization" - What is new with that?
  • Is Crowdsourcing Just The New Stone Soup?
  • Professional Services - What is your product?
  • Managing the Social Marketing Funnel
  • Organic Leadership: Business from the bottom-up
  • Social Marketing Campaigns for B2B Marketers
  • Not My Fault
  • Analyzing is more than just Counting
  • Can Old Dogs Learn New Social Business Tricks?
  • Focus on Mission, Deliver Customer Experience
  • Social SMB - Be more Open in 2011
  • Social Media: The Impact on Customer Surveys
  • Social LeadGen for Real-World SMB Marketers
  • Why Sales People Dislike CRM Software
  • Social Business is as Old as Business
  • Electric Cars are Cars
  • Being Stategic Every Day
  • Corporate Social Networks and Communities
  • The Power of Collaboration
  • Social Business: To measure or not to measure?
  • Great Product earns Loyalty, Great Service earns Customer Advocacy
  • Social CRM Use Cases for SMB [Expanded]
  • Augmented Customer Relationship
  • Customers Want to Spread the Good News
  • The Twitterfeed is Dead
  • Where are the Early Adopters of Social CRM?
  • Engaging with the Social Customer (Social Business Series V)
  • Business Lessons from the Free Software Community
  • My Personal Notes from CRM Evolution 2010
  • Men are from CustomerLand, Women are from VendorLand
  • Leadership in the Social Business Era (Social Business Series IV)
  • Where Social Leads Come From (Social Business Series III)

O que fazemos


  • Social Sales
  • Social Marketing

Sobre Nós


  • Nosso Business
  • Empresa
  • Oportunidades de trabalho
  • Notícias
  • Contato

Produto


  • Social-IDNow™
  • SocialSalesNow™
  • Free Trial
  • Preços

Blogs


  • Social Business
  • Sales is a Human Activity
  • Technology at Coffee Bean
  • Tutorials and Guides
  • Direto do Vale

Recursos


  • Click Company Booklet
  • Social Marketing Guide
  • White Papers
  • Developer
 
 
  • Política de Privacidade
  • Termos e Condições de Uso
  • Site Admin

Copyright (c) 2012 Coffee Bean Technology - Todos Direitos Reservados